It's time we had a serious discussion on '_ _ _ Control'

Arguably the most conflicting situation that would arise between our Citizens and the State will be the day the State introduces encroaching regulations and declares what is best for a child over the will of their parents. We have seen the state meddling in similar affairs when abortions are allowed without parental consent or notification. We have also seen the State step in when social services declare a parent unfit to raise a child. Presuming the nature of our government, in that it's growing and taking upon more and more 'responsibilities' that inches towards a collectivist run society through the will of the voters rather than an individual society focused on preserving liberty, we must entertain the idea of the State pressing for further 'Kid Control' policy.

Kid Control, what will the future regulations consist of? Crime is riddled in low-income areas that depend on welfare which drastically increases the crime statistics of this nation. The State only encourages stagnant social mobility through their sub-par education system, subsidization of living standards, and monetary incentives to raise kids without a father. The collectivist attitute has not solved the poverty problem for the majority of those who have relied on such programs. The collectivist attitute has only spread the poverty problem. Social services are being drained because of the abundance of children to those whom cannot afford them.

China and their globally renown kind-hearted ways have enforced a one child per family policy unless the family is willing to pay for another child. Here in America it's quite the opposite, the middle-class that finds itself shafted by both the Republicans and Democrats gets to pay the state for the additional children of families who cannot afford them. Declaring once again that individualism is a thing of the past, libertarian ideology takes a back seat and the state steps in to feed a child whose parents cannot do it themselves. The child in essance is now an investment to society, and an investment to society which is paid for by the tax payers is deemed a 'public good' which defines the taxation as just.

Libertarian ideology claims that parents should have the free-will to have as many children as they like, though the tax-payer should not be forced into funding those children. Democrats generally believe that families should be able to have as many children as they like, and that the tax-payer should be forced into funding those children up to a certain standard of living.

Should we find out if the majority of the children who were raised by families that demanded government assistance to care for their children are living up to the expectations of a 'public good' from those who are supporting them? In other words, the expectations of the people of the State regardless of their economic knowledge and what it's like to live poor and the social mobility surrounding it? Regardless, I know many who are funding the public good and would like to start with some simple regulations for the upcoming debate on 'Kid Control' not just for poor families but for all families. China has 'Kid Control' and it's working for them, so we need to start having a serious discussion about it before it's too late.

1.) A child shall be aborted by age 18 if they are deemed mentally unstable through a mandatory psych evaluation each year.

2.) A child shall be aborted if they are under the age of 18 and are caught fathering or mothering another child. Mandatory DNA tests.

3.) A child shall be aborted if they engage in any sort of gun violence. This will drastically reduce gun crime to go along with all the regulations the Democrats are advocating for.

4.) Any child that is a coined a 'public good' to the State (one that is surviving off the welfare of the people) and found commiting a crime will be aborted and all of the other responsible families that are raising children that are deemed a 'public good' will have their benefits reduced instantly for the protection of society. This measure will be taken to prevent any future incidents.

This is clearly a Win-Win situation for the left. Abortion and Gun Control is without a doubt supported by the left though a Death Sentence isn't. But we must take into account the rights of the people of the state, a loophole is found when we realize it's their public good and their public good = their choice.

A heavy belief on state regulation impeding the rights of law abiding citizens is nothing new to both parties. People should now come together and have the courage to declare what is best for society over the will of their neighbor which will have us all leading the charge on 'Kid Control' in days to come.

I'm sure there are more regulations that will be implemented but this is just a start. We have taken similar measures on alcohol, drugs, drunk driving, guns, and now it's time to ensure the safety of all Americans through 'Kid Control'. As the State has been inching towards collectivism it's time we introduce this much needed legislation. As long as our two-party system believes in their inherant 'right' to tell others who to marry and what kinds of guns they can or can't own because of the actions of few who break the law, Kid Control will be a much needed debate. Our nation will greatly benefit through this legislation at the expense of a little liberty for the safety of those who believe in the State taking action over their fellow man.