'Idle No More' and 'The White Man'

From a perspective of an American White Male I believe 'Idle No More' would gain more support from the 'white man' by addressing the word 'white man'. When us white people hear that term we feel targeted for the blame of the past. This isn't new, we've heard it from the communities of minorities in the media while the majority of white people have nothing to do with anything. Unfortunately this has taught many common people to hit the 'turn off switch' to these type of movements due to knowing that they fall under the term. For they are conditioned to believe that these movments imply blame upon them.

You must clarify that it was GOVERNMENT that mistreated the natives and moved them off their land. If you were to use the term 'White Man' today you would label a huge chunk of society that knows only family, sports, work, and friends. The same things everyone else, no matter what ethnicitiy, is involved in. We must administer that the term has a different meaning now than it did when the Europeans first arrived. Perhaps one of the Native leaders on here could write an essay on how the term 'White Man' meant something entirely different in the past, that it had nothing to do with blame or prejudice. Spread the word that many 'White Man'(Europeans in the Americas) and Natives were friends until Governments started encroaching the land without permission. Reconcile with your neighbors and let them know they are friends just as they were when they arrived, not targets for blame which the media has constantly conditioned everyone to think we are. Unite everyone against the authority that strips the liberty from people of all backgrounds. Unite them against the conditioned mentality that they are somehow to blame.

If there is hate and blame in the hearts of Natives for the 'White Man' just because people today share the same color skin as the people under government rule who were told to excommunicate the tribes off of their lands, the people will not side with them. There is blame to be put, but it's not with the common people that associates themselves with the term 'White Man'. It's with the authority of rule that even they live under. Direct this blame correctly and you will have the power of over 100,000 men drawing back the bow of justice sending the arrow of your movement nearly unstoppable.

Orginize a tactic so that you can win the hearts and minds of everyone through common brotherhood. A tactic that will mend the hearts of Natives. A tactic of eradicating the conditioning of the term 'White Man' to be associated with prejudice and racism. A tactic of uniting everyone and showing where the true blame deserves to be; not with the 'White Man', but with government authority that violates these treaties. Here in America it is the same authority that imprisons people illegaly, dismantles the constitution, and chooses winners and losers in what is supposed to be a free market. The 'White Man' too is anxious for justice.

Distinguish the principle of how the term 'White Man' isn't synonymous with Government any more. Let your neighbors and those in your tribes be aware of this fact. You can wake up many of the 'White Man' if you distinguish to them as now being being synonymous with peace, equality, and friendship rather than the words they've been led to believe through social conditioning. If you can find a tactic to accomplish the erradication of the stigma surrounding the term 'White Man' and restore the meaning into something positive and constructive, then the massive amounts of 'White Man' will be Idle no more.

Enact the Representative Removal Act

Imagine if we held our politicians accountable to a higher standard rather than allowing them to wage partisan bill-drafting wars that sells the futures of unborn generations. Our debt problem would have been solved in a matter of seconds, not by choosing violence as the next resort, but by granting the citizen the power to remove political officials in the same way they were elected. I feel as a society of individuals, including the politicians, we have forgotten about the real dangers that allows misbehavior to continue with only the possibility of the voting-cycle to change the political status-quo. This imbalance of power has taken advantage of this nation long enough. It has allowed politicians to serve their terms regardless of direct violations of American principles, and regardless of citizen consent to their authoritative actions.

Who holds the politicians that vote on such measures accountable for their actions? Certainly not the people. Every politician who voted to send young men to their deaths in war paid no price of their own. The American politician is liability free outside the political domain during his or her term. When have political officials stepped down from citizen disapproval in recent history due to their actions in governance rather than scandals that are of no political concern? This has stemmed largely from the power the media holds over the people. Politicians can continue to vote upon the bombing of women and children, policies that bankrupt our nation, while voting against the very platforms used to win their seat in office; Lies only to get elected. If a politican is found sending a nude photo, or something of that extent, it will be the end of their political career through media hysteria. I say Americans put their morals in order and it's time we flip the script.

Deciding to take such action will be difficult when the media constantly promotes politicians as celebrities, as some politicians do indeed grow fond of, that the people, including the politicians thesmelves, feel they hold the utmost authority. However the prime displeasement of any intelligent person when it comes to the media-politician relationship is the sale of the idea that politicians are the chosen ones capable of solving national problems within their term limits. The citizens, who always take the brunt of the blow from political policy, must heed the call and act faster, less the dangers of partisan bickery, tied to the coffers of lobbyists, bury us in debt.

Our nation must respond faster than the election-cycle. If the politicans won't act in the peoples best wishes, it's time the people take action without the politicians best wishes. It's time for citizens to deem politicians as civil servants rather than the celebrities they are glamoured to be. It's time for citizens to have the ability to vote upon the removal of officials that comprise the Senate and the House at any given time. Politicians should be held accountable at all times for their actions in governing, not only through elction cycles when term limits expire, rather through a pro-active citizen base with the authority to remove their representative, constantly holding them accountable, to the standard in which they deem fit.

The Seperation of Church and State.

Socialism and communism enacted through governments rather than voluntary means are best defined by central planning and central funding through aquisition of capital by force ... which is nothing new to both the progressive and conservative movement. The US government consisting of Republicans and Democrats constantly pass legislation without the interest of the citizen while ramping up welfare and warfare spending. Dependency on government constantly grows as we allow the further accumulation of power into the hands of the political elite. If the progressive movement actually cared about the wealth inequality of the 1% then the first people on their verbal lynch list would be the politicians who cater to these special interests within their own party. Remember when our so called 'liberal' citizens opposed military occupation and war under President Bush? Ironic how they voted for Obama again amidst his warfare policies which were no more 'liberal' than Bush during his first term. As for his second term, Syria here we come?

When it comes to the articles we've seen on gun control, Thomas Sowell shows once again that statistics provided by the anti-gun community are indeed cherry picked half-truths only swallowed as complete truths. The majority of these people heavily support the nanny state as the prime solution to not just problems of violence, but to all problems under the sun. Anyone who declares the liberal left of America as a non-religious institution needs to only be reminded of their dogmatic belief in the states ability to solve a problem. What was the bi-partisan solution to the recession going into 2008? Bailouts and Stimulus. More Neo-Keynesian policy from our overlords that acts as a modern-day religion from a self-selected holy book of thought. Another recession looms over our heads inching closer and closer while our nation puts blind faith into government to fix the very problems their policies not only created but perpetuated into larger problems.

Does it come as a surprise to anyone that the dogmatic left compares the United States to the small countries they wish us to resemble; completely forgetting about the differences of American social history and our constitution? When will we see the anti-gun community comparing us to Mexico? Britain always seems to be the liberals country of choice in almost every aspect on what they wish America to model. It's their faith of government intervention which makes the British system their patron saint. On my facebook I saw a post from a girl which said "Gun Control is the only way!". It certainly is to the ignoramouses of society who wish to continue down the path we're on which allows government to further impede personal freedom for more bureaucratic power.

If the issue of gun control was actually a safety concern to the anti-gun community in our nation, they would first advocate our government disarmament to a lower standard than your average citizen before any new legislation was promoted. Simply for history continuously revealing that the most gun-violent institution on the face of this earth has without a question of a doubt been the institutions of government. The body counts totalled worldwide from civilian shootings is a drop in a bucket compared to the body count tally of government institutions. Logic points that if we pass gun-control we as citizens of this nation should enact it first upon our government before the very thought of imposing further restrictions on our neighbors.

Say something passes, do the waves of regulations restricting a citizens firearm snowball from its prior precedent once there's another mass shooting? Am I suppose to have the same religious faith as my liberal friends in the benevolency of the State continuing the regulation process for our collective best interest? That our government which has become the church of the left is somehow different from all the other churches that went wrong within the last century alone? Our state currently: continues the war on drugs, shows its fiscal irresponsibility at every turn, lies about its pre-election intentions (Gitmo anyone?), appoints corporate and political puppets into cabinet and positions of power, inflicts casualties on innocent women and children overseas, and our current leader is an official peace prize winner. If our leader is considered a peace prize winner then either peace prize awards have declined inversely related to the rise of 1oz of 'Au' since the start of Bush's second term through the end of Obama's first term, or this has become the 'standard' of a peaceful leader when it comes to our state, the same leaders running the 'church' our liberal left wants us to put more faith into.

Now what I am about to say the liberal left has proclaimed constantly and I agree with them. Even so far as to agree that these words are so important to American policy it's time they apply it to their own dogmatic beliefs. Americans need to demand that everyone, not just christian Republicans but also the liberal left, be held to the same standards regarding the issue known best as 'The Seperation of Church and State.'

People Praise Junk

Someone told me that one of the best opening scenes in any film was the table scene in 'Inglorious Bastards'. Do you consider that a great opening scene? From the top of my mind the opening scene of 'The Dark Knight' shows the unoriginality of the Inglorious Bastards opening blatantly as a glass of Merlot spilled on a white tuxedo.

In the film The Dark Knight, dialogue is shown through a course of events which pushes the story forward right off the bat. In Tarintinos scene our characters sit at a table with people underneath them. What many non-writers fail to see is that the latter scene is constructed from a Hitchcock writing tactic which is best described as 'Putting the bomb under the table'. Its direct approach of timidness will have many claim the dialogue is what allows the scene to classify itself as an exception to the rule when it comes to opening scene expectations. No, we already saw men sitting at a table not doing much in his earlier film Resevoir Dogs. That's right, could this be recycled at all? Tarintino wasn't even brave enough to be creative about it, he took the concept of this Hitchcock tactic for his film Inglorious Bastards word for word like a presidential election bumper sticker and managed to stretch it into the exitement of a Saturday's Noon-to-Six algebra lecture. Now let's compare the motionless opening from Inglorious Bastards to that of The Dark Knight.

The Dark Knight has the ball rolling instantly after some shots of skyscrapers establishing the city environment. Our plot begins to unfold through a series of events, an element of creativity is thrown in as the villains execute one after another to recieve a larger portion of the money pool until we remain with the last man standing. Abracadabra, like a prestige trick from David Copperfield, Ta-Da! The mask comes off and the Joker is revealed. The audiance is buckled in for the ride; captivated and instantly hooked.

What your general audiance seldom knows about the opening scene in The Dark Knight is that this too is another Hitchcock tactic. Remember the plane scene in 'North by Northwest'? The difference is the technique used wasn't so blatantly obvious. The Dark Knight opening scene was creatively written with an abundance of conflict that tied together organically to construct the films opening scene. Near the end of the scene we realize the man we had been watching in the mask was the Joker, he resembled the plane in North by Northwest all along!

Now back to the boring table scene. Do you remember it? It was nothing but men sitting at a table with many people beneath them that were hiding and hoping for freedom. I sometimes wonder if that opening scene would best be credited as a metaphor regarding the current state of affairs on the entertainment industry. Shoving all of the creativity into small confined spaces only to reign down with hellfire once the evil man at the table extorts what it wants from the artists willing to sacrifice their integrity. What ensues is unoriginality manufactured as ready-to-be-shipped final products.

As for the rest of the opening scene from Inglorious Bastards by Tarantino, its outcome is highly predictable which shows once more that the long drawn out dialogue serves as nothing but a 'new-era' style painting to his audiance. The mouth breathers stare upon such scenes and think it's mesmerizing but similar to those with the trained eye of an artist they can see what it truley is, a desperate coverup to pass the work off as artistic talent, or in this case more specifically, writing talent.

It's time we had a serious discussion on '_ _ _ Control'

Arguably the most conflicting situation that would arise between our Citizens and the State will be the day the State introduces encroaching regulations and declares what is best for a child over the will of their parents. We have seen the state meddling in similar affairs when abortions are allowed without parental consent or notification. We have also seen the State step in when social services declare a parent unfit to raise a child. Presuming the nature of our government, in that it's growing and taking upon more and more 'responsibilities' that inches towards a collectivist run society through the will of the voters rather than an individual society focused on preserving liberty, we must entertain the idea of the State pressing for further 'Kid Control' policy.

Kid Control, what will the future regulations consist of? Crime is riddled in low-income areas that depend on welfare which drastically increases the crime statistics of this nation. The State only encourages stagnant social mobility through their sub-par education system, subsidization of living standards, and monetary incentives to raise kids without a father. The collectivist attitute has not solved the poverty problem for the majority of those who have relied on such programs. The collectivist attitute has only spread the poverty problem. Social services are being drained because of the abundance of children to those whom cannot afford them.

China and their globally renown kind-hearted ways have enforced a one child per family policy unless the family is willing to pay for another child. Here in America it's quite the opposite, the middle-class that finds itself shafted by both the Republicans and Democrats gets to pay the state for the additional children of families who cannot afford them. Declaring once again that individualism is a thing of the past, libertarian ideology takes a back seat and the state steps in to feed a child whose parents cannot do it themselves. The child in essance is now an investment to society, and an investment to society which is paid for by the tax payers is deemed a 'public good' which defines the taxation as just.

Libertarian ideology claims that parents should have the free-will to have as many children as they like, though the tax-payer should not be forced into funding those children. Democrats generally believe that families should be able to have as many children as they like, and that the tax-payer should be forced into funding those children up to a certain standard of living.

Should we find out if the majority of the children who were raised by families that demanded government assistance to care for their children are living up to the expectations of a 'public good' from those who are supporting them? In other words, the expectations of the people of the State regardless of their economic knowledge and what it's like to live poor and the social mobility surrounding it? Regardless, I know many who are funding the public good and would like to start with some simple regulations for the upcoming debate on 'Kid Control' not just for poor families but for all families. China has 'Kid Control' and it's working for them, so we need to start having a serious discussion about it before it's too late.

1.) A child shall be aborted by age 18 if they are deemed mentally unstable through a mandatory psych evaluation each year.

2.) A child shall be aborted if they are under the age of 18 and are caught fathering or mothering another child. Mandatory DNA tests.

3.) A child shall be aborted if they engage in any sort of gun violence. This will drastically reduce gun crime to go along with all the regulations the Democrats are advocating for.

4.) Any child that is a coined a 'public good' to the State (one that is surviving off the welfare of the people) and found commiting a crime will be aborted and all of the other responsible families that are raising children that are deemed a 'public good' will have their benefits reduced instantly for the protection of society. This measure will be taken to prevent any future incidents.

This is clearly a Win-Win situation for the left. Abortion and Gun Control is without a doubt supported by the left though a Death Sentence isn't. But we must take into account the rights of the people of the state, a loophole is found when we realize it's their public good and their public good = their choice.

A heavy belief on state regulation impeding the rights of law abiding citizens is nothing new to both parties. People should now come together and have the courage to declare what is best for society over the will of their neighbor which will have us all leading the charge on 'Kid Control' in days to come.

I'm sure there are more regulations that will be implemented but this is just a start. We have taken similar measures on alcohol, drugs, drunk driving, guns, and now it's time to ensure the safety of all Americans through 'Kid Control'. As the State has been inching towards collectivism it's time we introduce this much needed legislation. As long as our two-party system believes in their inherant 'right' to tell others who to marry and what kinds of guns they can or can't own because of the actions of few who break the law, Kid Control will be a much needed debate. Our nation will greatly benefit through this legislation at the expense of a little liberty for the safety of those who believe in the State taking action over their fellow man.

As a Young Freshman

Freshman year my buddy and I almost shit ourselves laughing numerous times. Almost got kicked out of summer school for it too. Why were we laughing? The story wouldn't make sense to anyone, not even myself. But we were 14 and 15 during that time. We were young teenagers. The age between leaving the end of childhood (skateboards, magazines, pipedreams) and becoming a young adult, discovering yourself in an older world. We all went through something similar in Jr.High. We developed a strong friendship during 12 and 13 and now we had to go through the motions all over again at a new school.

The pressure weighed down on us when we became freshman so we stuck together like brothers. Joined the Football team like everybody else. I fell in love from a distance with a girl in one of my classes. I was always looking at her and trying to find an excuse to talk to her. Just trying to get those scraps that a Freshman can to feel visible to those around him.

Social groups were already forming and we didn't know what to do. But we both tried our best to keep our spirits up. If anyone had problems with him, they had problems with me. And vice-versa. Even made another brother from such display of loyalty. The laughter during these years was the best I'll ever have. Because the laughter then still had a flicker of the children we use to be combined with a mind that knew its juvenile rebelliousness was on its death bed. We laughed to burn what was remaining of that child fuel as much we could before a new school completely transformed us all over again.

We're still friends even though we are very different. We took seperate paths after Sophomore year. I was one of his only friends that visited him when he got locked up even though we hadn't talked much before then. Our friendship goes in spurts because such are things when you're older. I'm going to his moms house this Friday actually for his sisters birthday. I'm hoping he's there. It's like rewinding time when we hangout, except we're drinking beer and have our own stories now. Sometimes we even break out the skateboards searching for where those laughs escaped to. Hoping we'll find just one left inside, because just one would make all the difference.

If you look back at your friendships during these times and you aren't a little bit sad when thinking about it, then you missed out. Friendships like that are few and far between.

Gonna take a shot of whiskey for it.

Demise of Men

Frivolous endeavors for simple pleasures

I hope you feel you're going somewhere

All can find some delight in taking the ride to our... nevermind


Reason or truth you won't bear, nothing remains quite so clear

following the path your parents took, aren't they just so happy for you

Look at how they live and there you'll be in 30 more years


Conditoned to believe in their fears if not for a helping state beyond repair

Remaining so intwined is a structured life, one asks can I walk away?

So many Tangled-twisted in their vines, tightening themselves from an ancient time.


What a way to die men

What a way to die men

Look around you

What a way to die men

What a way to die men

It all surrounds you


So do you lead or follow men. Do you find reluctance in your picture perfect lifestyle?

Did you ever stop to question why? Did you ever think there's more to find?

You believed there wasn't more to this. No one ever told you so.

Manufactured thoughts march in line. Where did your souls go? Where did your souls go?


What a way to die men

What a way to die men

Look around you

What a way to die men

What a way to die men

It all surrounds you


Now send your kids to school. Just watch them march in line.

What do they really learn? Just watch them march in line.

The Government loves you.

Voting Red or Blue. Just watch them march in line.

What do they ever learn? Just watch them march in line.

The Government loves you.

Good little boys and girls. Just watch them march in line.

Learn from your parents kids. Just watch them march in line.

The Government loves you.


They're all dying men.

You're all dying men.

We're all dying men.

Demise of men.